African data infrastructure

The infrastructure between African data owners and the labs that need it.

Texadata connects African data owners with AI companies that need high-quality, legally usable African data. We verify where the data comes from, who holds the rights, and how it can be used — then license it to the right buyers.

Verified, in hand, auditable per asset
2,413
transactions
8,284
instalment payments
₦7.60bn
contract value
38
estates, 8 states
20
media assets
39:49
media runtime
Network portfolio — operator stated

What sits behind the catalogue.

Material under management across our originating clients as of September 2026. These are portfolio figures reported by the holders, not per-asset verified counts — the catalogue below is the verified, playable subset, and every figure in it can be audited against a file. We keep the two apart deliberately.

50
originating clients
Why these are separated. A supplier who blends stated portfolio scale into verified counts cannot answer “produce the instrument for this asset” — which is the first question a serious buyer asks. Everything in the sample catalogue survives that question. Our clearance standard →
The problem

African data is not missing because it does not exist. It is missing because nobody cleared it.

The continent's broadcast archives, production libraries and everyday environments are largely absent from training corpora. Not because the material is unavailable — because it is fragmented across thousands of small rights holders with no route to market, no rights infrastructure, and no counterparty who knows how to buy it.

Fragmented supply

Thousands of holders, no aggregator

Radio stations, production houses, ministries and independent videographers each hold small-to-mid volumes. Individually none is worth a frontier lab's procurement cycle. Aggregated and cleared, they are.

Undocumented rights

Possession is not title

The party holding the tape is frequently not the party holding the right. Commissioned work, staff output and acquired programming each carry different defects. Nobody has traced them.

Wrong instrument

Distribution licences do not cover training

Almost every existing African media licence was written for broadcast or distribution. None of them name machine learning as a permitted use, which means none of them are usable by a lab.

Evidence

The coverage gap is measurable, and we measured it.

Buyers are told African data adds “diversity.” That undersells it. We ran open-weight Whisper over the speech in our own catalogue. It does not underperform — it fails outright, and the failures are reproducible from the licensed files.

75%
of one transcript is a single hallucinated sentence, repeated 60 times
28/29
Nigerian Pidgin segments returned as ambient noise rather than speech
5
conflicting transcriptions of one phone number read aloud on air
4
different languages the decoder assigned across eight recordings from one country
What we do

Four functions, one chain of custody.

01 — Originate

Find and onboard the holder

We work directly with African broadcasters, production houses, ministries, podcast networks and independent operators — and commission purpose-built collection where no archive exists.

02 — Verify

Establish that title is real

Chain of title traced from creation forward. Layered rights identified. Where an asset cannot be evidenced, it does not enter the catalogue.

03 — Clear

Execute a training-specific licence

The instrument names AI and machine learning training as a permitted use. Subject and speaker consent is collected where individuals are identifiable or audible.

04 — License

Deliver to the buyer's standard

Masters in original format with per-asset metadata and rights records, to the volume, structure and annotation depth the buyer specifies.

Engage

The full sample pack is released under NDA.

Masters, metadata sidecars and the rights record for each asset. Scope, volume and rate are set per buyer.